In Session
Put your question before the panel.
Several models deliberate in the blind, a lead writes the verdict, and the verdict is
fact-checked against the live web — every claim cited, every phase inspectable. Free to start.
— The order of proceedings —
I
The panel answers
Every model responds to your question on its own, sealed off from the others — no groupthink, no anchoring.
II
The bench deliberates
Answers are stripped of their authors and each model critiques and ranks the rest. A Borda tally settles the standing.
III
The lead rules
A presiding model weighs the deliberation and the standings, then writes the single best combined answer.
IV
The record is checked
A web-grounded verifier tests the ruling against live sources — every checkable claim earns a numbered citation.
V
The verdict, reconciled Verdict
Corrections are folded in and the final answer is handed down — cited, labeled, and open for inspection at every phase.
— Why a panel, not a chatbot? —
One model, alone
One voice — one set of blind spots
Agrees with you too easily
Sounds confident even when wrong
No sources — you take its word for it
vs
The Consilium panel
Several frontier models answer independently
Blind peer review — no names, no favorites
A lead model writes one reasoned verdict
Every
claim tested against the live web — labeled Fact Opinion
and cited [3] [7]
The difference between an opinion and a verdict.
Your own chamber. Conversations stay private to your account.
On the record. History is kept in PostgreSQL and survives restarts.
Credit-metered. Every verdict draws visibly from your allowance — no surprises, no meters running in the dark.